Begin as you intend to continue

It is the simple efficiency that should appeal to an organization by adopting a "begin as you intend to continue" philosophy. I'm not referring to the same high level of effort or intensity that Charles H. Spurgeon was speaking of in his quote "Begin as you mean to go on, and go on as you began..." But from a design and operations perspective. Too easy is it to design for failure — to implement a design that may be expedient, but sets an organization up for upheaval when a temporary solution needs to be replaced by automation or simply to satisfy accounting and governance requirements.

The Pitfall: Designing for Failure

The Solution: Design for Automation (DfA)

Embracing this philosophy means shifting from designing for human intervention to designing for automated, reliable workflows.

Key Principles for Operational Sustainability

By starting with a robust design — "beginning as you mean to go on" — an organization avoids the low-level drain of errors and builds trust in their systems.

Sources

  1. Struto — Human Error vs. Automation
  2. Blueprint — 7 Hidden Risks of Automation Design
  3. LinkedIn — Digital Transformation Without Process is Failure by Design
  4. Today's Medical Developments — Design for Automation
  5. Waybook — The Founder's Guide to Standardizing Your Business
  6. Medium — Design for Failure
  7. CIO — Designing to Fail: A Paradigm Shift